By Michelle Eckert, Marketing and Communications Coordinator for the Mack Institute
Editor’s note: This post originally appeared on the Mack Institute’s Mack Talks.
When Wharton undergrads Adina Luo and Molly Liu (both W’16) had an idea for a custom-tailored denim start-up,they used Kickstarter to propel Black Box Denim into existence. And when their classmates wanted to give parents a way to monitor their child’s temperature remotely, they turned to Indiegogo to fund their fledgling company FeverSmart.
These students tell an increasingly familiar story. Crowdfunding has exploded in popularity since 2009 (the year Kickstarter launched), and its pace shows no signs of slowing. Although its most obvious beneficiaries are the individuals or small teams who’ve gained unprecedented opportunity for start-up success, Mack Institute-funded researcher Ethan Mollick argues that the trend poses important implications for established firms as well.
One key development has been what Mollick likes to call the “democratization of innovation.” Innovation is always limited by who controls the money. Venture capitalists, the traditional gatekeepers, fall prey to all kinds of biases: they tend to favor someone who is male, well-connected, or located near the VC firm, for instance. Crowdfunding provides a way for inventors to circumvent these obstacles, and in some cases vault clear over them — studies have shown that women actually tend to perform better than men when crowdfunding tech start-ups.
Crowdfunding has made it so that just about any idea can get funded; that doesn’t mean every idea should get funded. (We’ve all heard about that potato salad guy.) Remarkably, Mollick’s research has shown that the crowd is pretty good at picking winners. In a study co-authored with Ramana Nanda of Harvard Business School, he found significant overlap in how expert judges from the National Endowment for the Arts rated theater projects compared to the crowd. Mollick has also done survey work evaluating the success of gadget-related projects. Although many deliver results behind schedule, 90% of the projects that raise more than $5000 ultimately turn into ongoing ventures. One third end up hiring employees and generating over $100K in revenue after just a year or two.
This is all very exciting for every would-be entrepreneur with nothing more than an idea and a dream. But why should established firms take the crowdfunding phenomenon seriously?
Mollick points out that in the past few decades, studies show that “huge amounts of the key innovations that have come out of industrial labs actually start as user innovations.” Users have long been a key (if undervalued) driver of innovation at large firms. When users can suddenly raise capital to develop their ideas themselves, firms get cut out of this action.
There are a few approaches that Mollick recommends large companies take. First, since crowdfunding sites make projects so public, firms can use them to identify promising investment opportunities. Secondly, firms can monitor activity on these sites to gauge new market opportunities or trends in customer demand. Finally, there’s the adage that if you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em — or, rather, invite them to join you. Crowdfunding sites overflow with creative, enterprising people. Why not use Kickstarter to help identify your next brilliant new employee?